A space-age icon from the 1970s is under threat! The iconic BMA Chatswood skyscraper, with its unique curved design and rooftop restaurant, is facing demolition. But this isn't just any old building; it's a piece of history that holds a special place in many people's hearts.
Architect Peter Lonergan, who grew up on the north shore during that era, recalls the thrill of riding the external lift to the Moon Terrace restaurant, feeling like he was on a lunar mission. For him, and many others, this building represented a unique and memorable experience.
But here's where it gets controversial... A proposal to demolish the BMA Building and replace it with the tallest structure in Chatswood has sparked a wave of nostalgia and a fight to save this architectural gem. The building, known as the Panorama, has become a symbol of a bygone era, with people sharing their fond memories of first dates, trying new foods, and the excitement of that space-age lift ride.
The architect behind this iconic design, Hugo Stossel, a migrant architect with an incredible story, has gained newfound appreciation thanks to the efforts of heritage consultant Rebecca Hawcroft and architect Paul Georgiades. Stossel, a Hungarian-born modernist, fled Nazism and brought his European architectural training to Australia in 1939. His work, including the BMA Building, has been revived in popularity, with many now recognizing his contribution to Australian architecture.
Despite the outpouring of love for the BMA Building, it's not currently listed as heritage. If demolished, it will make way for a massive 61-storey mixed-use development. Hawcroft acknowledges the difficulty in arguing for its retention, given the need for new housing and the building's current state of disuse.
But this is the part most people miss... Even though the BMA Building might not be an exceptional example of architecture, it holds immense emotional value for the community. It's a reminder of a time when architectural innovation and unique experiences were celebrated.
Architects Lonergan and Georgiades, who have worked on heritage projects themselves, agree that the Panorama building is not the best example of Stossel's work and would be challenging and costly to repurpose. Georgiades even went as far as saying, "It's got to go."
So, what do you think? Should we preserve this piece of architectural history, or is it time to make way for new developments? The debate is open, and we'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments below!
